The U.S. Patent System, not China’s IP Policies, is the Reason Behind America’s Decline in Global Competitiveness

THE U.S. PATENT SYSTEM, NOT CHINA’S IP POLICIES, IS THE REASON BEHIND AMERICA’S DECLINE IN GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS Several months ago, the Trump Administration launched an investigation into Chinese trade policies that are responsible for expropriating American intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights).  This investigation is premised upon Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974

PTAB Facts: An ugly picture of a tribunal run amok

PTAB FACTS: AN UGLY PICTURE OF A TRIBUNAL RUN AMOK By Gene Quinn, Steve Brachmann, Josh Malone, & Paul Morinville Published by IPWatchdog It has come to our attention that supporters of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) are claiming that the facts and figures presented in various IPWatchdog.com articles are erroneous. That

PTAB Errors Fatal to Hundreds of Legitimate Patents

PTAB ERRORS FATAL TO HUNDREDS OF LEGITIMATE PATENTS (This article first appeared on IPWatchDog) Apologists for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including Greene’s Energy Group and the Department of Justice continue to proffer the fallacy that the PTAB is merely “correcting” errors committed by the USPTO in issuing “bad” patents through the use of America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant

PTAB Errors Fatal to Hundreds of Legitimate Patents

PTAB ERRORS FATAL TO HUNDREDS OF LEGITIMATE PATENTS By Josh Malone & Steve Brachmann Published by IPWatchdog Apologists for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including Greene’s Energy Group and the Department of Justice continue to proffer the fallacy that the PTAB is merely “correcting” errors committed by the USPTO in

Will the Supreme Court continue to be influenced by patent reform?

WILL THE SUPREME COURT CONTINUE TO BE INFLUENCED BY PATENT REFORM? By Paul Morinville & Gene Quinn Published by IPWatchdog We’ve analyzed all of the Supreme Court patent related decisions since 2005 comparing them to proposed patent related legislation pending at the time of the decision. Invariably, the Supreme Court takes a

Go to Top