Activist Supreme Court Sides with Big Tech on Patent Invalidation Board

ACTIVIST SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH BIG TECH ON PATENT INVALIDATION BOARD FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 21, 2021 ACTIVIST SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH BIG TECH ON PATENT INVALIDATION BOARD Rights of Inventors Harmed by Conservatives Decision to Give MORE Power to Key Political Appointee US Inventor represents the interests of

China Hijacks US Patent System to Steal American Inventions

CHINA HIJACKS US PATENT SYSTEM TO STEAL AMERICAN INVENTIONS China’s comprehensive innovation plan includes exploiting our own faulty and inadequate laws and institutions for their gains and our losses. Chinese companies are now leveraging the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to their advantage, invalidating hundreds of

Call for nominations for USPTO Patent Public Advisory Committee

CALL FOR NOMINATIONS FOR USPTO PATENT PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE US Inventor is seeking an inventor to nominate for upcoming vacancies on the Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC). The PPAC was created in 1999 through the Patent and Trademark Office Efficiency Act. The committee reviews the policies, goals,

Patent Rights – Inventor Rights – Where Did They Go?

PATENT RIGHTS - INVENTOR RIGHTS - WHERE DID THEY GO? There was a time in America when inventors and small business innovators were cherished for their invaluable and, at times, disruptive, creations. Their contributions helped make the American Dream real to virtually anyone, through advancing technology as well as providing

US Inventor Rejected by California Court; Files Suit Against U.S. Patent Office in Texas

US INVENTOR REJECTED BY CALIFORNIA COURT; FILES SUIT AGAINST U.S. PATENT OFFICE IN TEXAS (MARSHALL, Texas, February 8, 2021) — At US Inventor we are standing up for independent inventors and small businesses whose survival depends on the integrity of the U.S. patent system. A patent is often the only

US Inventor Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case Akeva v. Nike

US INVENTOR FILES AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPREME COURT CASE AKEVA V. NIKE In their Amicus Brief, US Inventor highlights an inconsistency in patent law in regards to claim construction methodology. Whether Federal Circuit judges will use a claim-centered or holistic approach to claim construction is uncertain. The question presented in

US Inventor Files Amicus Brief Highlighting the Appointments Clause Violation in the PTAB

US INVENTOR FILES AMICUS BRIEF HIGHLIGHTING THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE VIOLATION IN THE PTAB The administrative patent "judges" (APJs) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are given the privileges and authority of principal officers without being appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, as the Appointments Clause

Go to Top